Would the decriminalization of marijuana have a net positive or Research Paper

Would the decriminalization of marihuana have a interlock positive or negative impact on Canadian society - Research Paper holdNevertheless, its use in the medical community is creation supported because appargonntly its benefits to patients would far outweigh its risks. Its use in Canada is considered a crime and harsh penalties are imposed among violators. Suggestions for its decriminalization are currently being discussed. This paper shall now discuss whether or not the decriminalization of marijuana would have a wampum positive or negative impact on Canadian society. It shall also discuss who would benefit and who would support from its decriminalization. This paper is being undertaken in order to establish a clear and comprehensive understanding of marijuana, its implications for use, and its general impact on society. Discussion Under the 1923 Opium and Drug Act, marijuana was classified as an illegal dose and those violating the provisions of the act were li fitting t o face criminal penalties (Khoo). In 1997, marijuana was covered by the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, and this right is the main legislation which some interest groups are seeking to amend. They cite how the Ontario Court of Appeal was able to decide in favor of the possession of 30 grams of marijuana mostly for medicative purposes (Khoo). The court argued that forbidding marijuana would be tantamount to violating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Canada is considered the first nation to apply the regulated medicinal use of marijuana however, the Marijuana Medical Access Regulations did not adequately consider the issue of amateurish use (Khoo). In 2003, a new ruling by the Ontario court decided that the possession of minor amounts of marijuana was not anymore valid the courts noted how hundreds of thousands of young Canadians were engaged in recreational marijuana use and that no firm legal provisions on the use of the dose have been answer forth by the l egislators (Khoo). The Ontario Court of Appeals then passed new rulings in order to make it easier for patients to avail of the drug for medicinal purposes. To this day, this issue has yet to be settled in Canada (Khoo). And this issue involves relevant players including the patients who need marijuana for medicinal purposes, the recreational drug users, the doctors who prescribe the content for their patients, the legislators who have the burden of deciding on deviation (or not passing) the law to decriminalize marijuana, police officers and law enforcement authorities who are enforcing the law, and the international community. These individuals and social groups are all stakeholders in the resolution of the issue on the decriminalization of marijuana. For those who use the drug for medicinal purposes, they desire that decriminalizing marijuana use would largely be beneficial to them because they would be able to benefit from the medical benefits of the substance effects which they would not be able to experience from any drug or any separate intervention. Decriminalizing marijuana use can be beneficial for the following purposes to stimulate appetite of HIV/ support patients and to relieve cachexia of crabmeat patients to relieve and reduce nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy among cancer patients to reduce the intraocular pressure for glaucoma patients to provide analgesic effect for cancer patients and to relieve the spasticity and nocturnal spasms caused by neurological and movement disorders (Yambura, pp. 2-4). For these reasons, patients positively impacted by marijuana use would stand to gain from the decriminalization of marijuana. The main issue being taken with the decriminaliza